American Politics  » Banishing Immigration Newspeak

Banishing Immigration Newspeak

For nearly thirty years, Michigan's Lake Superior State

University has released an annual List of Banished Words, a brief

inventory of the year's most annoyingly popular expressions, with

the recommendation they be "banished from the Queen's English for

mis-use, over-use and general uselessness."

This year, the tiresome "metrosexual" and the insufferable "bling

bling" were deservedly condemned, as were several war-inspired

entrants such as "embedded journalist" and "smoking gun." I was

disappointed that none of my three choices for this annual

dishonor made the cut, however. My nominees for banishment were:

"Guest worker program," "Matching willing workers with willing

employers," and the worst offender, "Work Americans won't do," as

in "our economy needs illegal immigrants because they do work

Americans won't do."

Combined, these three Orwellian phrases are calculated to convey

the impression that there are certain occupations so inherently

dangerous or otherwise disagreeable that we lazy, self-indulgent,

American crybabies must rely on hardy immigrant stock to roll up

their sleeves and get the job done for us. Tell that to a

Pennsylvania coal miner!

Although it's true that less glamorous jobs are frequently filled

by illegal aliens, the jobs themselves are not intrinsically

unacceptable. Rather, the ready supply of illegal labor has

resulted in many perfectly satisfactory jobs becoming

unacceptable. In short, illegal aliens will work under unsanitary

and unsafe conditions for minimum wage or even less, thereby

"work Americans won't do" are solid proof that big lies still fit...

lowering standards, and as long as employers can fill jobs by

exploiting illegals, there will simply be no incentive to improve

wages or working conditions.

A recent piece by Nancy L. Othón and Mike Clary in the South

Florida Sun-Sentinel illustrates this principle in action with

the story of Gregorio Ruiz Aviles and Lauro Marquez Hernandez,

two young Mexican illegal alien construction workers crushed to

death in the collapse of a three-story building on which they

were working. Five other men were injured in the accident. The

Florida company which employed them was fined $2.4 million for

having no workers' compensation insurance, but according to Othón

and Clary, "five months after the deaths of Ruiz and Marquez, few

public officials, employers, workers and immigrant advocates

express much hope that change would come soon in an industry

where undocumented workers willingly take any job they can get."

Worse still, employers who play by the rules are easily underbid

by their unscrupulous rivals, and the downward pressure on wages

and safety intensifies. And this phenomenon is certain to worsen

-- not lessen -- under any program which would legalize the

process. Why? Because a "documented" worker is easier to deport,

and will therefore be more likely to do "work Americans won't do"

to avoid unemployment and ineligibility. A guest worker program

will therefore simply institutionalize the current gray market

for employees who will tolerate the intolerable.

It's a tenuous doctrine, that American workers are so expensive

that even American companies can't afford them, and the plan to

extricate ourselves from this invented predicament by pinning our

hopes on the newly legendary Mexican work ethic is flimsier

still. And yet, there is some evidence that muddleheaded

Americans are being persuaded by the hypnotic repetition of

immigration Newspeak issuing from the White House, the Congress,

and the major news media. A February 2004 Gallup Poll found that

46% of Americans support President Bush's plan to legalize

Mexican nationals currently living here illegally, "as long as

they hold jobs that no U.S. citizen wanted to do."

George Orwell famously observed that political speech is

"designed to make lies sound truthful and murder respectable, and

to give an appearance of solidity to pure wind." What else can be

said of a phrase such as "undocumented worker" which presupposes

the subject is working, and transmutes the violation of our

borders into an apparent paperwork mixup? Will we now refer to a

bank robbery as an "unauthorized withdrawal?" And what shall we

call the children of undocumented workers? Undocumented students?

Orwell forewarned us more than fifty years ago that sloppy

language begets foolish thinking -- and vice versa -- and it's as

true today as ever. Purposely misleading expressions such as

"work Americans won't do" are solid proof that big lies still fit

neatly into short phrases.

It's time we banished them.

About the Author

Mr. Salientian is a regular contributor to PHXnews.com. You can read more of his articles on politics, economics, trade and immigration at HotFrog.org.